“How should “territory” be properly understood!
Thread Content
“\"Territory\" refers to the scope under the responsibility of a specific position, which can be the work area, the physical assets that are managed, as well as specific tasks or projects; it can also refer to the range of authority and responsibilities. So, how does everyone understand the definition of this territory?
Can it be merely a tangible jurisdiction?
Tangible, this makes it easier to assign responsibility to individuals! Clean one’s own doorstep first
The further one goes to the grassroots level, the more concrete and tangible the significance of local jurisdiction becomes； The higher one goes, the more abstract and conceptual the reference to the territory becomes. For example, for those working at specific positions, their jurisdiction is mainly the area where their position is located ； As for the top management level, their jurisdiction mainly refers to their area of responsibility and authority.
“The further one goes to the grassroots level, the more concrete and tangible the significance of local jurisdiction becomes； The higher one goes, the more abstract and conceptual the reference to the territory becomes. ” It’s described very vividly and practically! It is this kind of one-size-fits-all approach that has distorted territorial management.