Thread Content
The DN150 steam pipeline must be properly sealed at the openings that pass through the fire wall, as required. So here’s the question: Option 1: The pipe cannot move up, down, left, right, or forward; it’s similar to a fixing frame, but the stress distribution might not be optimal. In that case, a fixing frame can be installed right next to it, so that the pipe at the opening doesn’t move or experience much stress – which is good. However, the piping system will need to be carefully arranged afterward, due to the presence of this fixing frame. Option 2: The pipe can only move back and forth, similar to a guide frame? Can fire-resistant walls be used for load-bearing purposes? What is the exact situation, and how should the pipe rack at the opening be designed?
No doors or windows should be created in the firewall; when it is necessary to do so, Class A fire-resistant doors and windows that are fixed in place or can close automatically in case of a fire must be used.
No doors or windows should be created in the firewall; when it is necessary to do so, Class A fire-resistant doors and windows that are fixed in place or can close automatically in case of a fire must be used.
I think firewalls shouldn’t have a weight; pipes can be extended
In accordance with Article 6.1.6 of GB50016, steam pipes may pass through firewalls.
Would it be better to use the first option?
Can I add a few elbows at the wall penetration?
I think fixed fire-resistant doors and windows of Class A, or those that can close automatically in case of a fire, should be used. You can also refer to the answers from other users above; I have also learned * it