HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Issues regarding pipeline strength testing and leakage testing

2017-07-20View Original

Thread Content

There is currently a pressure pipeline made of GC1, with chloromethane as the medium, and a design pressure of 1.8 MPa. 1. According to GB50235, pneumatic testing can be used for the strength testing of pipes with a pressure of less than or equal to 0.6 MPa. 2. According to SH3501, the pressure strength test pressure shall not exceed 1.6 MPa. 3. The medium is flammable and highly toxic; a leakage test shall be conducted in accordance with SH3501. The test pressure is the design pressure of the pipeline, namely 1.8 MPa. I would appreciate some advice from the experts: for items 2 and 3, doesn’t this pressure value create a contradiction?
Reply #22017-07-20
Many standards are conflicting; it is recommended to follow the strict ones!
Reply #32017-07-21
One is the strength test. . . . One is the leakage test. . . . It’s different. . .
Reply #42017-07-21
Strength tests are different from leakage tests
Reply #52017-07-21
The pressure strength test and the leakage test use similar testing methods
Reply #62017-07-21
The pressure strength test and the leakage test use similar testing methods
Reply #72017-07-28
Which standard should the reference design follow? It is recommended to use water pressure plus airtightness! Air pressure must take safety into account
Reply #82017-07-28
Pneumatic testing is a strength test; usually, hydraulic testing is used for strength tests, unless the pipeline cannot be exposed to liquids; The leak test is a airtightness test, and the pressure used in this test is equal to the design pressure

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.