Thread Content
The desulfurization efficiency of organic amines or ionic liquids is essentially beyond doubt. However, the actual operating costs are often beyond the bearing capacity of some enterprises, mainly due to three factors: 1. Steam consumption. 2. Electricity consumption. 3. Consumption of organic amines or ionic liquids. At a bidding session, I heard that the smoke volume is 300,000 cubic meters, the steam consumption is 3 m3/h, and the consumption of organic amines or ionic liquids is 2 tons per year. I wonder if such requirements can be met Or what are some good methods everyone has for saving energy and reducing consumption?
Sign the contract like this and you’ll ruin him. These days, many people are very good at fraud
Someone really said that; I’m not sure if it’s true or not. Everyone who is familiar with this topic, please provide the correct answer!
The steam consumption is 8 t/h; such a low consumption of ionic liquid is definitely not acceptable.
This is impossible to achieve, unless his is a super ionic liquid
Design the steam capacity at 38~40 tons
Design the steam capacity at 38~40 tons
The specific figures are not clear; it’s just said that the steam consumption is quite high. Some people said 8 t/h, while others said 38–40 t/h; the difference is quite large. It should refer to conventional medium-pressure steam. I’m not sure what the specifications are for steam at 3 m3/h; it might be 2000°C and 100 MPa, which would probably be sufficient as well :P
Also check the SO2 concentration. Of course, if this is the outlet of the acid production unit, there must be a problem; 400 kPa of steam at 8 t/h, along with 50 t/year of ionic liquid, seems more reasonable
The last edit to this post was made by renyi7552 on 2020-12-31 at 11:58. Steam consumption is almost linearly related to the regenerated rich liquid; we can achieve 70 kg of steam per ton of rich liquid. If 20 kg of SO2 is desorbed per ton of rich liquid, then that corresponds to 3.5 tons of steam per hour for each ton of sulfur dioxide