HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Type of steam seal at the turbine shaft end

2020-04-09View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by kudingcha on 2020-4-9 at 16:32. Seeking feedback on the performance of brush-type steam seals, honeycomb seals, Braden seals, and floating tooth seals
Reply #22020-04-09
The design institute advises you: The most commonly used type of seal in the petrochemical industry nowadays is the comb-tooth seal; for example, those used by Hangzhou Automobile, and they have significant leakage issues, requiring the use of steam extractors to remove steam. Large-scale units in the power industry almost all use Brayton cycles, and the results are very good. However, it is not suitable for small units. It is said that honeycomb type is better than comb-type, but it doesn’t seem to be used very often.
Reply #32020-04-10
Honeycomb seals perform very well at the turbine shaft ends
Reply #42020-05-05
The sealing performance of Bryden is relatively good, but the honeycomb structure tends to wear out easily

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.