Thread Content
Currently, the certification for pressure vessel design approvers issued by the CSCBPV is managed by the Gas Cylinders Association. Originally, it was the CSCBPV that was responsible for providing training; after completing the training organized by the CSCBPV, the certification was updated on the CSCBPV website (http://www.cscbpv.org.cn/). However, on the Special Equipment Standardization Service Platform run by the Gas Cylinders Association (http://www.bzh365.net/index/index.shtml), the certification indicating completion of CSCBPV training is not updated – the old certification remains displayed, and it is shown as invalid. Does completing training provided by the CSCBPV mean that the certification for pressure vessel approvers has to be invalidated as well? Do I need to retake the exam at the Gas Cylinders Association? Is this clear? Do you think this certificate requires retraining and testing at the Gas Cylinders Association?
The education and training section on the Special Equipment Standardization Service Platform of the Gas Cylinders Association does not update the new certificates issued by the Certification Committee for Containers, instead marking their status as invalid.
Regarding designers, **there are relevant regulations! Follow the regulations!
Do certified personnel still need to attend training organized by institutions such as the Rating and Certification Committee and the Gas Cylinders Association in the future? The Gas Cylinders Association organizes exams to certify design reviewers; should designers take these exams as well?
Currently, certification reviews recognize certificates issued by the Standards Approval Committee; however, it is still uncertain whether certificates issued by gas associations are recognized or not.
The approval process is in a complete mess right now – sometimes it’s handled by this association, sometimes by that one, and in the end there’s no consistency.
Training is too overemphasized these days. Everyone is a senior manager – they have money and power – but no one seems to recognize the hard work of the designers; instead, there’s only competition for power and profit, with no sense of responsibility at all. The deities form factions for petty gains and fight constantly, leaving the ordinary workers to suffer – when will these fights ever end, when will there be peace? How miserable.
**It’s been discontinued; it’s no longer useful.
The qualifications for approvers are no longer included in the **professional catalog. As for the qualifications of third-party assessment and approval officers recognized by appraisal reviews, there are currently only the certificates from the former Evaluation Committee plus continuing education! Those who need to continue their education this year cannot do so; I’m not sure what to do The eligibility of approvers can also be approved through on-site evaluation at the time of certificate renewal. As for the qualification certificates for approval officers from gas associations, the evaluation panel of the Chemical Equipment Association does not recognize them. It is unclear whether there are any changes at the moment. But this year, their class assessment notice was released. The renewal of pressure vessel manufacturing certificates (including design) is handled by the assessment panel of the Chemical Equipment Association. The situation regarding the renewal and issuance of pressure vessel design certificates by engineering company design institutes is not very clear; please provide an answer from the engineering company design institutes! Thank you!
When the powerful fight among themselves, it’s the ordinary people who suffer. It would be fine if non-destructive testing and inspection of special equipment were carried out properly. The salaries are high and the jobs are stable, but these people only focus on others’ wallets, disregarding any sense of decency. Such conflicts only lead to the cancellation of certifications; after all that effort, no benefits are achieved, and it harms designers and the quality of the industry. Haha, it’s absolutely ridiculous.