HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Questions regarding the prerequisites for inspecting the butt welds between long-neck flanges and cylinders

2020-09-24View Original

Thread Content

According to 6.6.1.2 of NB/T47020, for long-neck flanges, when the operating pressure is greater than or equal to 0.8 times the maximum allowable operating pressure specified in this standard, the butt weld between the flange and the cylinder must undergo 100% radiographic or ultrasonic testing. Taking the example shown in the diagram, as required above, is it necessary to conduct 100% radiographic or ultrasonic testing on the butt weld between the flange and the cylinder?
Reply #22020-09-24
What pressure rating flange should be selected?
Reply #32020-09-24
This post was last edited by KASSEM on 2020-9-24 at 13:41: flange pressure 4.0Mpa, material 16Mn Ⅱ
Reply #42020-09-24
340 degrees is not low. Let’s do a 100% radiation scan!
Reply #52020-09-24
To meet the design requirements: 2.93 MPa + 340°C!
Reply #62020-09-24
This post was last edited by wanlirn on 2020-9-24 at 14:47. I’m not sure what material your flanges are made of; could you give an example? For instance, if you use standard flanges with a pressure rating of 4.0 MPa, you would look up the maximum allowable operating pressure at your working temperature, which is 3.0 MPa. If the operating pressure indicated in your diagram is 2.6 MPa, this is higher than the maximum allowable value of 3.0 MPa; therefore, 100% RT testing is necessary.
Reply #72020-09-24
In other words, is it to compare the maximum allowable operating pressure of the flange at the design temperature with 80 percent of the design pressure?
Reply #82020-09-24
What you’re referring to here are the mandatory requirements for selecting flanges, which is not the same as what the original poster asked about
Reply #92020-09-24
I used to understand it the same way, but after seeing a diagram from a certain complex, it stated that…
Reply #102020-09-24
This post was last edited by wanlirn on 2020-9-24 at 15:07. It’s no big deal – there’s no need to make a fuss about it. The design institute can certainly set higher standards. He believes that this equipment is quite important

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.