Thread Content
Will this device achieve good heat exchange performance in a space of 36㎡?
How should this question be answered? The heat exchanger is designed based on the parameters required by the process; if it does not meet the needs of the process, it is a design flaw. The likelihood of such errors being common is low, right?:)
This heat exchanger has a relatively low heat transfer efficiency, as the diameter of the tube sheet is equal to the length of the tubes; consequently, the flow path is short. There are only two baffle plates, resulting in a shorter contact time with the utility fluids, which prevents optimal utilization of the system
The heat exchange efficiency depends mainly on the requirements of the project. The heat exchanger in question has small pipe openings; fluid flows in at the bottom and out at the top of the shell side. The heat exchange tubes are not long, so the replacement time is short, and the temperature difference between the inlet and outlet should not be very large
The equipment is small, the investment is low, and the processing capacity is also low – don’t worry about it!
It’s not good; it’s too short, and the baffle design is also unreasonable.
Well, what can I say about this heat exchanger! It’s better than nothing! There are roughly 100 inlet and outlet ports on the pipe train. The pipeline flow rate is too low
The pipeline is too short; the results may not necessarily be good
Are the notches on the baffle plates a bit too small?
It’s determined by the manufacturing process. We produce many similar heat exchangers that perform just as well. There are also butanol gas condensers, as well as PVC monomer reactors with a diameter of 3500 and a tube length of 3000. Just two years ago, we installed 50 of these units at once
Determined by calculations carried out by the process engineering team. The anti-scour plate structure in the shell side of the diagram is a bit special; it should not affect the piping layout.