Does this opening need to be calculated for combined reinforcement?

2026-06-26View Original

Thread Content

Holes are made in the cylinder, as shown in the figure. I would like to ask whether it meets clause 8.1.4 b) of GB/T150.3-2024; is it necessary to perform calculations based on a non-strong joint? (There’s disagreement now! ）

Reply #22026-06-29

Three or more adjacent ones should refer to the situation in Figure 8-4

Reply #32026-07-03

Why? Does it meet clause 8.1.4b?

Reply #42026-07-03

Why? Does it meet the requirements of clause b in GB/T150.3-2024?

Reply #52026-07-07

Clause 8.1.4 provides a provision for exemption from additional reinforcement; whether joint reinforcement is required shall be determined in accordance with 8.3

Reply #62026-07-07

Just verify whether the reinforcement areas overlap

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

Does this opening need to be calculated for combined reinforcement?

Thread Content

Related Threads in This Forum

← Previous

Next →

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links