Thread Content
This post was last edited by wiseboy on 2017-11-27 at 14:56. At a seminar, someone said the following: 53% of equipment manufacturing companies rely on making emergency calls for help or using Baidu to seek assistance for their technical tasks. Such companies are willing to buy a few bricks but not to invest in technology. In their view, bricks weigh a few kilograms, while technology is like paper that weighs just a few grams, or even software that has no weight at all. A technical issue that could have been resolved in a few minutes took them days to fix, as they kept making phone calls and searching on Baidu. What’s not realized is that the time and money spent on such efforts far exceed the investment required for technological solutions, and what is achieved as a result is usually unreliable, making all that effort in vain. Conclusion: These companies will eventually be eliminated.
Agree with this view. In particular, it needs to be shown to some bosses. But where do these data come from?
Are the data accurate? **The statistics bureau may not be able to provide accurate figures either. In my opinion, it’s not even 50%.
53% of equipment manufacturing companies are in this situation; who will dare to buy domestic equipment going forward? Sigh
53% refers to the number of enterprises, not the number of products. Companies come in different sizes. Your dozens of small businesses may not produce as much as one large enterprise. This very understanding is an example that supports their viewpoint.
I didn’t think they would get eliminated; although I really dislike companies of that kind, they’re all doing fine
This post was last edited by letitbe on 2017-11-29 at 10:58. Moreover, it’s not just manufacturers; many small and medium-sized \"engineering companies\" are the same way – they operate informally but do well, while those that follow formal procedures end up going bankrupt