HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Is it necessary to install anti-backflow plates in U-tube heat exchangers? Please reply, guys. Thank you

2020-08-24View Original

Thread Content

At 3.1 MPa, with a steam flow rate of 1.2 m/s and a steam temperature of 280°C, is it necessary to design an anti-erosion plate? Thank you
Reply #22020-08-24
Okay, thank you. One more question: if the steam flow rate is only 0.4 m/s, is it still necessary to add it? After adding it, part of it cannot be routed through pipes.
Reply #32020-08-26
GB151 requires the installation of anti-impact plates; per clause 6.8.1.1,c, this applies in the presence of corrosive gases, steam, and gas-liquid mixtures
Reply #42020-08-26
There are definitely experts providing support; thank you for sharing your knowledge
Reply #52020-08-26
According to relevant safety regulations, it’s better to do so
Reply #62020-08-27
The anti-erosion plate is designed to protect the heat exchange tubes; it has nothing to do with U-tubes. GB151 specifies requirements regarding whether an anti-erosion plate should be used, and you can make a judgment based on your parameters.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.