HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Why are there differences in the water quality parameters for feedwater between GB/T12145 and GB/T1576-2018?

2021-12-10View Original

Thread Content

It was found that there is an indicator for oil content in feedwater in GB/T 1576-2018; however, this indicator is not present in the GB/T 12145 standard. Is the oil content indicator meaningless, and therefore no restrictions are needed? Or did it default to adopting the oil content criteria specified in GB/T 1576-2018? Furthermore, the water quality specifications for iron content differ in GB/T1576-2018 and GB/T12145-2016. Depending on the pressure, the values specified in GB/T 1576-2018 are 0.3 mg/L and 0.1 mg/L; however, in GB/T 12145-2016, they are 0.05, 0.02, 0.01 mg/L, etc. In actual quality control, which control indicators should be adopted?
Reply #22021-12-10
GB/T 1576-2018 Water quality for industrial boilers. GB/T 12145-2016 Quality standards for water and steam in thermal power generating units and steam power equipment. Are they talking about the same thing?
Reply #32021-12-10
Moderator, I mean that the water quality indicators for potable water in these two standards are different, hence my confusion. It seems that GB/T 12145-2016 is more stringent, so the strictest regulations should be applied during operation. In that case, GB/T 1576-2018 seems to lose its meaning. I’m not sure how the water supply to boilers is controlled in different places.
Reply #42021-12-10
This is easy to understand, right? Different things might require the same item, but the quality requirements for that item could vary.
Reply #52021-12-18
The scope of application for the two standards is different; each is used in its own context
Reply #62021-12-18
The scope of application for the two standards is different; each is used in its own context
Reply #72021-12-18
The scope of application for the two standards is different; each is used in its own context
Reply #82021-12-18
The scope of application for the two standards is different; each is used in its own context
Reply #92021-12-18
The scope of application for the two standards is different; each is used in its own context
Reply #102021-12-18
The scope of application for the two standards is different; each is used in its own context
Reply #112021-12-18
The scope of application for the two standards is different; each is used in its own context

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.