Which engineer uses the IA 8 version of the Foxboro system? How is this system?

I’ve heard of Foxboro, but I’ve never used it.

I used Foxboro’s IA system before, but I’ve forgotten exactly which version it was. Do you want to ask how this system is? It depends on who you compare it to. In my opinion, the control system in his device has a user interface that isn’t very user-friendly; in other words, it’s quite cumbersome to use. It’s like trying to use a Nokia after being used to smart phones – it’s not convenient at all. The keyboard input in configuration software like IEE is also extremely tedious. . . But this also gives it certain advantages: it is a small software, requires less memory space, and has low requirements for the computer. Generally speaking, foreign systems are relatively stable but expensive, as they have a long history of use and are applicable in a wide range of situations; even if there are bugs, they are fixed fairly quickly. As for domestic systems, I have used those from Zhejiang Zhongkong, and they suit Chinese users’ habits better (probably because they are entirely in Chinese). There are some bugs, but they are related to usage and operation only, and they do not affect production. It is still necessary to rely on feedback from a large user base so that engineers can make improvements.

It’s good; we just upgraded to IEE

Our unit only has big pineapple-shaped buoys, haha

It’s okay, especially the all-fiber MESH network. However, the software configuration is not user-friendly enough, and fewer and fewer people are using Pineapple DCS these days. Some upgrades and renovations use entirely domestic alternatives.

This post was last edited by zhysen on 2017-9-11 10:24. Thank you, moderator

What type of factory is Brother? Could you please share your QQ number?

For coal-to-methanol production, four-nozzle gasifiers are used, and the company’s main systems are all from FOXBORO

It is said that Foxboro has relatively reliable hardware