What forms are required for instruments from arrival at the factory to proper maintenance?

I’ve never done any maintenance work, so I think I need materials related to instrument design: instrument lists, cable lists, DCS wiring diagrams, manufacturer’s manuals, and things like that...

Have you seen the sample? Send me one

Here, we need different departments. The acceptance process is carried out jointly by the procurement department and the instrumentation staff. The instrumentation staff essentially act as laborers; most of the instrument boxes are made of wood, sealed with steel nails or even metal sheets. It is the responsibility of these staff to open the boxes. Then, one must inform the personnel in the procurement department of the model, quantity, and manufacturer of the instruments, who will then record this information in a notebook or mark it accordingly. Daily maintenance and repair records are nothing but superficial tasks that are of no real use; they are just surface-level work. The true responsibility of a instrumentation technician is to work on-site to reduce the failure rate of instruments, rather than focusing on keeping records. As for the inspection records, they’re completely fake. Hehe, there are less than 10 field instrument technicians in total, who are responsible for over 10 sets of equipment across the entire plant – they have to carry out maintenance tasks, repairs, as well as inspections. Do their supervisors really think that these instrument technicians are some kind of superhuman? ? Or those idiots who refuse to eat meat paste. . Archives, huh. The factory has come up with all sorts of forms – maintenance record cards, work logs, inspection route maps – all of which are completely useless. I privately suspect that it’s some relative of the factory’s manager who is lazy and wants to waste money by inventing these forms. In my opinion, a true instrument technician who deserves to be called such is one who has nothing to do; only when there is nothing to do can it be proven that the equipment on site is working properly. Those managers who keep asking about how much work has been done all day long are, in essence, idiots.

Working with instruments is essentially a matter of conscience. Different people handle an instrument failure in different ways, depending on their mindset. Resolving the fault is the goal, but different solutions result in significant differences in costs. Replacing a watch is not the same as repairing it. And most of the time it’s a fault with the instruments on-site; it’s not the instruments themselves that are broken, but rather minor issues with the accompanying components. But how many people go ahead and fix them? For the same instrument failure, replacing it with a new one can cost several thousand or even tens of thousands of yuan. But with a little patience and sense of responsibility, it’s possible to save the company that money; yet when you do so, the company shows no appreciation at all, not even a kind word from the management, so the only result is having to buy a new watch.