HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Garbled 485 communication in electromagnetic flowmeters

2019-06-11View Original

Thread Content

There is an electromagnetic flowmeter at the wastewater treatment site, used to measure the flow rate of the treated water; these data are collected by a data acquisition device and uploaded to the platform of the municipal environmental protection agency; Data transmission between the electromagnetic flowmeter and the data acquisition unit is achieved via 485 communication. At first, the operation of the equipment and data transmission were both normal. After some time, garbled characters appeared on the data acquisition unit (sometimes normal and sometimes garbled), while the flow rate displayed on the local display of the electromagnetic flowmeter was normal; it could be determined that the issue lay in the 485 communication between the electromagnetic flowmeter and the data acquisition unit. The digital data acquisition instrument manufacturer said the problem wasn’t on their end; when the flow meter’s display was taken to the manufacturer for testing, it was found that the 485 communication was also working properly. Has anyone encountered this situation? Or what are some places that can be checked?
Reply #22019-06-12
The pipeline section of the magnetic flowmeter should not have high leakage currents, and it should be properly grounded in its vicinity. Check whether such a situation exists; this is what comes to mind
Reply #32019-06-12
1. Replace with high-quality shielded twisted pair cable. 2. Use a RC network for filtering to reduce noise. 3. Reduce the baud rate for lower-speed communication
Reply #42019-06-12
1. The communication parameters between the data acquisition instrument and the flow meter are not consistent, including address, baud rate, parity, stop bit, etc; 2. Poor communication quality, mainly due to issues with the shielding of the communication cables; if the communication distance is large, it is recommended to increase the terminal resistance ; 3. Fault in the data acquisition instrument.
Reply #52019-11-30
It seems the data acquisition instrument has a bigger problem.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.