Thread Content
This post was last edited by 1111111 on 2020-1-16 at 20:00. Yesterday I was shocked to hear that Zhuhai has failed again —— explosions occurred. Well, I spent a whole day thinking about the instrument safety system... Instrument safety system, do you issue alarms? Do you cut off power? Alas, it seems you can only endure explosions and blows, right?~~~~. The universe has an eye; the New Year is approaching; those who disagree should come and argue. {:3_51:}
Some people are still willing to take risks for safety
Of course, in every accident the safety systems fail to function. Our devices have mechanisms for detecting excessive temperature, pressure, and explosive gases, as well as interlock protections, but there are always various reasons that lead to accidents. I remember that in Dalian, the accident worsened because the emergency shutoff valve failed to operate due to a power outage. With no casualties, this incident in Zhuhai might have been quietly resolved internally.
People make mistakes, and machinery and equipment also make mistakes; it’s inevitable
The SIS will not fail to function; in most cases, it’s simply not in use or not activated enough!
{:3_51:} SIS, if it can alert the authorities and take action, then why does it still explode? SIS, how can production take place if it’s not in use? The Work Safety Bureau and the Environmental Protection Bureau – do they carry out online supervision of factories? SIS, how much investment is considered enough? Is there any exact figure? {:2_37:}
This was a sudden explosion caused by a leak resulting from a crack in the pipe elbow; no more serious accidents occurred afterward, and there were no injuries. I think the instrument safety system played a key role in this!
To determine whether Changlian Petrochemical is part of Sinopec or a private enterprise, one needs to look at its legal representative and its largest shareholders; it closely resembles a case of state-owned assets being sold off at a low price