HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Range of classification criteria for coal

2018-08-19View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by angryant on 2018-8-19 at 14:31. When classifying coal, volatile matter content V, caking index G, and the maximum thickness of the vitrinite layer y are generally used as classification criteria. For example, the volatiles content of low-quality coal: >10~20. I don’t understand the greater-than sign “>”; what exactly is the range for the volatiles value? Who can explain it? In mathematics, it is written as: V<10, 10<V<20, V>20, etc., which makes it very easy to understand.
Reply #22018-08-20
I once shared your confusion as well; it was only later that I realized that judging the classification of coal based on just one coal quality analysis indicator can lead to inaccuracies. A determination can be made only by considering several indicators together. Therefore, the values for these indicators are usually given as ranges rather than fixed values
Reply #32018-08-20
My confusion isn’t about how many indicators are used for classification, but rather about the range of values for a particular indicator. For example, the volatiles content of low-quality coal is >10–20; is then a volatiles value of V=30 within this range? 30>20 Ah.
Reply #42018-08-20
Haha! I don’t understand it either; many of the standard descriptions in China are really bizarre!
Reply #52018-08-20
Therefore, several indicators need to be considered together to obtain more accurate results
Reply #62018-08-20
This post was last edited by angryant on 2018-8-20 at 19:04. Since it was already stated that the volatile matter content of low-quality coal ranges from 10 to 20, what does the › symbol before that mean? Personally, I think there are obvious errors in language expression and logic!
Reply #72018-08-21
There are many such descriptions in the national standards; it’s probably not a logical error, it’s just that we haven’t understood the intent behind formulating these standards
Reply #82019-01-28
Ha, it refers to the 10-20 range
Reply #92019-01-29
Then how can the greater-than sign ahead be explained?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.