Can the temperature rise in the first-stage reactor reflect the efficiency of combustion furnace recovery?
Thread Content
This post was last edited by liaifeng on 2018-9-6 at 19:25. With the same raw material – acidic gas, the same catalyst, and a similar processing scale, there is a significant difference in the temperature rise of the primary reactor. Can the temperature rise in the primary reactor reflect the efficiency of the combustion furnace, or in other words, the efficiency of the burner? Is it because highly efficient burners and furnaces have a high conversion rate, resulting in a low concentration of reactants entering the primary reactor, and thus a lower temperature rise in the reactor?
Have there been any changes to your sulfur production furnaces and burners during this period?
The two sets of units installed successively are used to treat acidic gases from oil refining; the only difference lies in the burners and combustion furnaces. However, the temperature rise at the inlet and outlet of the primary reactor differs by a significant amount, around 20°C.
I don’t think it has much to do with the sulfur production furnace and burners. Is it a catalyst issue?
It’s probably a catalyst issue. Is there a difference in temperature rise in the secondary reactor?
Is there a difference in temperature rise between the secondary reactors?
The temperature rise in the first-stage reactor is likely related to the hydrolysis capacity of the catalyst.