HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

How to deal with blockages in acidic gas pipelines of low-temperature methanol washing caused by carbon ammonium crystals

2017-05-22View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by liaifeng on 2018-9-1 at 12:19. The acidic gas line at the top of the methanol regeneration tower in the low-temperature methanol washing process often gets blocked; once blocked, the sulfur recovery system is shut down and the line is cleared. It’s very troublesome. Performance and reasons: 1. The ammonia level at the inlet of the ammonia washing tower was 15 PPM, while it was 5 PPM at the outlet. 2. The ammonia concentration in the lean methanol stream kept rising, reaching up to 140 PPM; the ammonia content in the fourth reflux tank reached 1.6%. After crystallization caused blockages, the pressure in that tower increased, while the pressure of the acidic gas dropped to 0.15 MPa. 3. A carbon ammonium crystal pipeline was installed, but when this pipeline was activated, large amounts of methanol entered the sulfur recovery unit, making it difficult to control the air supply there and also increasing the risk of catalyst coking due to blockages. Solution: Redirect the acidic gas to the flare, shut down the deep cooler, and raise the temperature to 65–70°C to eliminate crystallization. However, sulfur recovery is considered an environmental protection facility, and shutdowns or restarts require approval and registration with the environmental protection authorities. Question: 1. Is the ammonia washing tower not meeting the requirements, resulting in high ammonia levels at the outlet? 2. Is there any way to reduce or prevent blockages in acidic pipelines? 3. How to determine the air supply amount and avoid coking when acidic gases are not sent to the flare but directly fed into the sulfur recovery unit? 4. What should be done in case of high levels of methanol and ammonia?
Reply #22017-05-22
Is there no methanol wash tower at the sulfur recovery inlet? We have some
Reply #32017-05-22
No, it was removed during optimization in the detailed design. . . .
Reply #42017-05-22
You can consult the provider of the process package to find a solution; it’s likely the result of simplifying the wash tower. Simplifying things without understanding the process can be deadly
Reply #52017-05-22
Our factory also has such situations; it’s quite troublesome.
Reply #62017-05-23
This post was last edited by lizhaoye on 2017-5-23 08:30. Any suggestions?
Reply #72017-05-23
How did you solve it? Or any ideas? Need to learn* it
Reply #82017-05-23
First of all, the poster should analyze and compare the ammonia levels before and after using the ammonia washing tower; the amount of washing solution can be adjusted accordingly, and then some methanol can be replaced to see how effective it is. What is detergent?
Reply #92017-05-23
Water, at around 45°C; 39 ppm at the inlet and 6 ppm at the outlet. Methanol was replaced, about 1/6 of it was substituted; it had an effect, but that effect lasted only a short time, less than a month.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.