Thread Content
The demonstration project of Su New Energy Company to produce 4 billion standard cubic meters of coal-derived natural gas per year has been approved for a one-year extension. Author/Source: Date: January 15, 2019. Click-through rate: 15. Recently, pursuant to a document from the National Development and Reform Commission (Document No. FGBY-Nengyuan 1346), it was approved that the aforementioned demonstration project be postponed by one year. The demonstration project of Su New Energy Company, with an annual production capacity of 4 billion standard cubic meters of coal-to-natural gas, was approved by the National Development and Reform Commission on October 21, 2016. It is the first coal-to-gas project to receive approval since the 13th Five-Year Plan period, and it holds great significance for the development of China’s coal-to-gas industry, as well as for Jiangsu Province’s efforts to support Xinjiang’s development, and for achieving social stability and long-term peace in Xinjiang. After the project was approved, it failed to start construction due to various factors such as the lack of adequate coal resources and the unfinished construction of the pipelines for transporting coal-to-natural gas.
That place is not suitable for development.
It holds great significance for the development of China’s coal-to-gas industry, Jiangsu Province’s efforts to support Xinjiang’s development, as well as the overall goals of maintaining social stability and long-term peace in Xinjiang
This is taken from the Feasibility Study Report.
The traditional technical approach simply lacks any competitiveness. It’s fine not to build it. Avoid wasting market funds at the provincial level
What are the traditional technical approaches you are referring to? What are the latest technical approaches?
For the traditional technical approach, I’ll leave this assignment to you as homework :) The new technological approach involves direct sulfur-tolerant methanation of syngas, followed by desulfurization and hydrogen extraction (if necessary), which requires less investment and results in lower operating costs. . . . Many advantages
The technology you’re talking about is theoretical; it has not been industrialized at all and remains at the conceptual stage.
Regardless of anything else, has a sulfur-tolerant methanation catalyst been developed? Is it meaningful to discuss immature processes and technologies that lack demonstrative value?
You just like to eat ready-made food; as long as you’re happy that’s fine. I just haven’t encountered any opportunities to show my talents.