【Focus on the facts】Special inspections can be integrated into daily work
Thread Content
Today, many companies have clearly defined the job responsibilities of staff at all levels as well as those working on site, with the aim of clarifying and ensuring accountability at the individual level; I think this is a good approach. Employees in various positions or at different management levels all have a number of comprehensive checklists, which serve both as a record and as a guide for carrying out their tasks. Therefore, many tasks can be carried out in an orderly manner step by step. Recently, during a routine inspection by higher authorities, in relation to the seasonal work plans that were previously issued, special work records and inspection records were required to be submitted. Due to the excessive number of management levels, the documents were received only the day before the inspection, making it impossible to prepare any relevant work records or inspection records. However, in daily work, the tasks assigned by this document have long been carried out, and the records of these activities are clearly reflected in various recent work records, inspection records, as well as the actions taken to address any issues identified. However, the inspector only requires the submission of specific records; otherwise, corresponding assessments will be carried out. Is such a handling scenario reasonable? Is it considered a formistic approach? What kind of help can it bring to safe production when everything has to wait for official documents from higher authorities before special work records are created?
One view is that managers at all levels (including regulatory authorities) are also fulfilling the duties assigned to them by law, and it is only proper that they assume their managerial responsibilities. Moreover, since they are managers, proposing certain working methods and approaches based on practical needs is also aimed at helping those at the grassroots level carry out their work better. It should be understood and supported.
There is another view: it is considered to be formalism, done merely to reflect the bureaucratic system. In particular, some bureaucrats believe that the work instructions they issue need to be carried out in order to assert their sense of presence and achievement. It only adds the burden of word games to the grassroots level.
There is also a view that differentiated treatment is needed. Some enterprises are well-organized, have high management standards and strong technical capabilities; they are able to maintain orderly management, effectively control risks, and ensure production safety. However, many enterprises still lack such capacity for protection, and need guidance, operational advice, and safety warnings from higher-level authorities or regulatory bodies. However, as higher-level departments or regulatory bodies, it is necessary to treat cases differently, focusing on monitoring the effectiveness of the work rather than requiring uniformity in documents.
What are everyone’s thoughts on this? Please share your opinions; points will be awarded as a reward!
Most inspections are merely a formality. High salaries, good benefits, and skilled operators are the most crucial factors; 90% of accidents are caused by human error. It is essential to improve employees’ operational skills as well as their emergency response skills