HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

What impact does the temperature of K-type compensation wire have on T-type thermocouples?

2015-06-20View Original

Thread Content

What impact does the temperature of K-type compensation wires have on T-type thermocouples? I’m asking experts for help; I haven’t mastered the theory well, Ugh
Reply #22015-06-20
I’m not sure what specific value will be displayed, or whether it will be higher or lower than the actual value. However, I know that the temperature value shown definitely won’t correspond to any standard scale. I have dealt with similar issues before: a K-type thermocouple was connected to a compensation cable designed for the T scale, which caused the temperature readings to become incorrect. The readings seemed to be close to those of the J scale, but the difference was significant.
Reply #32015-06-20
The mV values of T-type and K-type thermocouples within the 50°C range are quite similar; according to the calibration tables, there is a difference of around 0.4°C, with the T-type thermocouple having a slightly higher mV value, which results in a slightly higher displayed temperature.
Reply #42015-06-20
2. The incorrect type of compensation wire is being used (taking K-type thermocouples as an example). The same type of compensation wire should be used with the same type of thermocouple; if the wrong type of compensation wire is chosen, errors will still occur. Assuming an S-type thermocouple is used, and the compensation wire Kx for a K-type thermocouple is selected, then according to the intermediate conductor law, the total thermoelectric potential received by the instrument is E′total(t1,t2) = es(t1,t3) + ekx(t3,t2) (5). If the proper compensation wire SC for an S-type thermocouple is used, and ignoring any errors in the compensation wire itself, the total thermoelectric potential measured by the instrument is Etotal(t1,t2) = es(t1,t3) + es(t3,t2) (6). Due to the incorrect selection of the compensation wire, the error in the instrument’s measurement is given by equation (5) minus equation (6), that is, E′total – Etotal = es(t1,t3) + ekx(t3,t2) – es(t1,t3) – es(t3,t2) = ekx(t3,t2) – es(t3,t2). If the operating temperature of the S-type thermocouple is 900°C, and assuming t3 – t2 = 8°C, the potential difference can be determined by referring to the calibration tables for both S-type and K-type thermocouples; this results in ekx(t3,t2) – es(t3,t2) = 0.278 mV. This indicates that the temperature measured by the instrument is higher than the actual temperature. If the instrument indicates 900°C, the actual temperature is only 875°C, resulting in an error of about 25°C. If the polarity is reversed under the aforementioned conditions, the instrument reading will be too high; that is, when the instrument shows 900°C, the actual temperature is 933°C, resulting in an error of about 33°C.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.