HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Selection of reinforcement rings

2015-07-10View Original

Thread Content

Regarding the selection of reinforcement rings, is it necessary to comply with standard 4736? I noticed that the reinforcement rings generated automatically in SW6 are roughly the same size as those specified in 4736; however, it’s also possible to enter a slightly smaller size, and SW6 doesn’t show any error messages in such cases
Reply #22015-07-10
The selection of reinforcement rings should comply with 4736.
Reply #32015-07-11
If there are standards, they should be followed...
Reply #42015-07-11
It is necessary to comply with standards. 4736~SW6 is a strength calculation software that does not rely on any specific standards; if a 23mm thick sheet meets the requirements, why would one need to purchase a 23mm thick sheet? Of course, one would choose a 24mm thick sheet – that’s the logic behind it

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.