Basketball discussion thread
Thread Content
Hey everyone, let’s discuss this: in college basketball, are science students better or literature students better? It seems that in recent years, the strong teams in CUBA have been made up of more science students!
I think it’s the science students who are better
Science students are definitely great. . .
What does it have to do with anything? I just don’t get it – those who compete are basically sports talents recruited specially by the schools. . . .
There are more men in science and engineering fields, and in terms of the ratio of participants, the men’s basketball teams in these fields are stronger
That makes sense; thumbs up. It’s a way to encourage students in the humanities as well, hehe;P
There are so many people in China – 700 million men – so why can’t we find 11 who play football? Why is the Chinese national football team so poor? How can this be considered proportional? Tradition and history are still very important.
It’s a misrepresentation of the issue – Chinese people aren’t particularly suited for football. In fields related to science and engineering, there are more men, and therefore the level of men’s basketball teams in those areas is higher compared to those in humanities-related fields; it’s not the same thing at all
There are so many people in China – 700 million men – so why is it hard to find 5 who play basketball? The Chinese men’s basketball team isn’t good either; it’s quite poor. How can this be considered proportional? Tradition and history are still very important.
It’s not a matter of misrepresenting concepts, nor is it that Chinese people are not suited for football (why was the Chinese women’s football team so strong for a certain period of time?). The problem lies in China’s football system; the environment for its development is extremely problematic.
When the Chinese women’s football team was strong, football wasn’t an Olympic sport yet, so surely other countries didn’t pay much attention to it