Under what circumstances is it necessary to implement the three simultaneities for technological upgrades?
Thread Content
In a chemical plant, there are projects such as the renovation of workshop roads, major demolition of workshops, and the relocation of some storage tanks – so is it necessary to follow the principle of simultaneous implementation of these tasks? Under what circumstances must technological upgrades follow the three simultaneities principle. Thank you!
Some storage tanks have shifted, and the three simultaneities are required; the process also needs to be changed. Changes in production volume and layout must all be implemented simultaneously
For facility upgrades, any related safety facilities, fire protection systems, environmental protection equipment, and occupational health facilities that need to be upgraded simultaneously must follow the principle of simultaneous implementation.
Is that true? Moving a storage tank requires compliance with the three simultaneities principle; then moving a tower along with its associated equipment would require even more compliance measures, right? If I don’t do it, what will be the consequences?
I remember that in Shandong Province, there were technology upgrade projects with investment amounts exceeding 500,000 yuan that required going through the proper procedures, namely the \"three simultaneities\" requirement.
Projects that include safety and environmental protection facilities must implement the \"three simultaneities\" principle.
It’s still unclear what exactly the situation is regarding the requirement of simultaneous implementation for technological upgrades.
Whenever there are modifications, expansions, or restructurings involved, the principle of \"three simultaneities\" must be followed; since most of the equipment in this entire workshop will be moved, this principle certainly applies here as well
If it’s not done and the relevant departments such as those in charge of safety supervision, environmental protection, and fire safety don’t detect it, then it’s fine; but if they do detect it…； It’s not a fine ； It means suspending production or limiting output for rectification, and this is still under the premise that there have been no safety or environmental incidents ； In the event of an accident, all responsibility lies with the enterprise, its senior management, the safety officers, and the chief engineer ； Those in charge of production and technology cannot shirk their responsibilities
Actually, is there any existing regulation specifying to what extent the three simultaneities requirement must be met? Personally, I think it’s better to go directly to the relevant safety supervision department; if evidence is needed, send a request to them for guidance.
I can’t believe this is real? It’s common for chemical plants to move their storage tanks; if they do this as well, then what else can those companies do?