Case analysis: Should the following situation be classified as a work-related injury? (3)
Thread Content
This post was last edited by slll611 on 2016-3-6 at 22:01. Work-related injuries need to be recognized by the human resources and social security authorities; only those confirmed as work-related injuries can qualify for the corresponding benefits. Therefore, the recognition of work-related injuries is crucial for employees. Due to the diversity and complexity of real life, many work-related injury cases with similar yet distinct characteristics have emerged in the practice of determining such injuries. To this end, several such cases will be selected for discussion below to help establish a clear definition of work-related injuries; the results will be announced in one week. Everyone is welcome to participate in the debate; all participants will receive a reward, with extra prizes for those who offer unique perspectives and detailed explanations. @zxz017 @LVZBMAN @hnan @wamj6566@*anpangpang @hanyu*a8 @No Regrets @Storage and Transportation Torch @Guan Gongyu @yu3606 @*aojiaoya0546 @Fish in the Desert @B0SS @Linlin Shangshang @Sulfur-Zinc-Aluminum @Ice Age Snow Tracing @soul_BOY_young @zxj5048386 @Liu Fei @Revisiting the Three Kingdoms liu Case: Zhu, a security guard at a certain company, left his post during working hours on the evening of March 22, 2013, and went to a logistics company where he sat on a sofa watching TV. He felt a headache while watching TV, and began to vomit and have convulsions. The employee at the logistics company saw this and immediately called 110 for help; he was then taken to the hospital by ambulance for emergency treatment. Due to the critical condition and slim chances of survival, the family decided to discontinue life-support efforts, and clinical death was declared at 7:40 on March 24. Zhu’s relatives believe that since Zhu’s illness outbreak occurred during working hours, it should be considered an occupational injury. Don’t forget to reply after voting, otherwise you won’t get the reward. For evaluation criteria, refer to: http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1556795-1-1.html
First, it wasn’t at the workplace, and second, there was no accident that occurred while performing job duties; therefore, it cannot be classified as an industrial injury.
First, it is not while at the work post; second, it is not during the performance of one’s job duties; third, leaving the post itself is an illegal act, so it cannot be classified as a work-related accident.
First, it is not occurring at the workplace; second, it is not happening while performing one’s job duties; third, leaving the post itself is an illegal act, so it cannot be classified as a work-related accident.
It should be considered a work-related injury, after all, it happened during working hours.
Cannot be considered a work-related injury: it was during working hours, but no work-related tasks were being performed, and there was an instance of leaving the post
If the incident occurred outside the workplace, it should not be considered an occupational injury.
I don’t think it can be considered a work-related injury; after all, it was his own negligence. . . If it happens at the workplace, it’s definitely considered a work-related injury. . .
Cannot be considered a work-related injury: leaving the job during working hours
(1) Death from a sudden illness occurring during working hours and at the workplace, or death within 48 hours despite emergency treatment. Both conditions must be met simultaneously: “working hours” and “work position”. “Death due to sudden illness” refers to: 1. An employee suffering from an illness unrelated to work that results in death. If death is caused by an illness related to work, it shall be recognized as a work-related injury in accordance with Article 14 of the Regulations on Work-related Injury Insurance. 2. If an illness unrelated to work occurs at the workplace and does not result in immediate death, but the person dies within 48 hours despite efforts to save them, it is considered an occupational injury. The above cases do not constitute work-related injuries~
It should not be recognized as a work-related injury. Not at the workplace, engaged in activities unrelated to work.