18.30 Project
Thread Content
From an economic perspective, is it still worthwhile to build the 18.30 urea project?
The advantage in unit cost is lost, and the raw material costs are high
No, it’s not recommended to do that! ! There’s no profit! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
There is a severe overcapacity; what advantage is there if there are no raw material resources? Make a decision after conducting a thorough investigation.
It’s pointless; **it’s not recommended to use any of them. The minimum requirement for new projects is 3052.**
It’s not easy to get approval now in 1830, right?； Currently, it’s quite difficult to get project approvals for capacities below 300,000 tons of synthetic ammonia
After the gasification upgrade, there was a surplus of syngas, so expansion upgrades were carried out.
Upgrading and renovating is fine, but building new would not be appropriate.
It makes no sense to continue using them; our country’s fertilizer industry has moved past the stage of small-scale nitrogen fertilizers, and is now moving toward larger-scale, single-series production. The overall consumption of large-scale facilities will decrease, and as competition intensifies, smaller facilities will gradually shut down due to cost issues. The process of elimination is essentially a price war.
If all competitors within the sales radius are 1830, there is a chance of survival