Flow meter selection issue, ammonium chloride
Thread Content
Ammonium chloride, DN80 pipes, maximum flow rate of 36 M3/H; the density of the unsaturated solution is around 1.3. An electromagnetic flow meter was chosen for this application. It’s a small company, and the management considers the price to be too high. Are there any better alternatives? MVR system
If it is just a simple measurement point (that does not participate in control or regulation), then a target-type flow meter will suffice; it’s inexpensive, and domestic ones will work just fine.
As far as I know, target flowmeters are more expensive than reed electromagnets. . .
Electromagnetic flowmeters aren’t expensive these days either; does your company need to be frugal~~~~~~~~~~~~:)
It’s still a listed company, I really don’t know why such deductions are made; P
It depends on your requirements; if accuracy isn’t critical, choose the rotor series – metal rotors are available, and the cheapest option is the glass rotor.
It’s probably because the price quoted for the unit electromagnetic flowmeter you inquired about is too high. You can consult us
Nothing is more suitable than electromagnetism.
Wow, this company still complains about the high price? ! Never mind, you guys had better not measure it. Even when using orifice plates, it’s necessary to use a decent transmitter such as those from Yokogawa, and they aren’t cheap either
I’m not very familiar with media; for those that can serve as a substitute for electromagnets, orifice plates are generally the cheaper option. The rotor estimate can’t be used; the diameter is a bit too large.
An electromagnetic flowmeter was chosen. In a small company, the management considered the price to be too high; presumably they don’t fully understand it. If a more detailed explanation were provided to the management, things might improve