How can county-level monitoring develop under vertical management?

Thread Content

　　The Fifth Plenary Session of the 18th Central Committee of the Party proposed to implement a vertical management system for monitoring, supervision, and law enforcement by environmental protection agencies at the level below the provincial level. This will systematically address the issues in some areas where development is given priority over environmental protection, as well as the interference with environmental monitoring and law enforcement efforts. How to effectively implement this system and enhance the technical capabilities of county-level monitoring agencies has become a new challenge and test for the grassroots environmental protection sector. 　　First, introduce relevant policies and systems. **Relevant policies and regulations should be introduced as soon as possible, covering aspects such as the organizational structure, tasks and functions, staffing, and financial support for county-level monitoring agencies. Clarify vertical and territorial responsibilities to guide provinces and autonomous regions in formulating relevant supporting systems based on local conditions. Clarify the tasks and responsibilities as well as the work scope of county-level monitoring agencies, and strengthen the capacity building of their staff. 　　Second, take the lead in piloting and continuously pursue reform and innovation. Based on the responsibilities related to monitoring and the actual circumstances, reforms should be carried out to improve the structure of county-level monitoring agencies; pilot projects can be conducted to reform aspects such as the nature, functions, staffing, and management of these agencies. For the large number of county-level stations with diverse types, it is necessary to follow the principles of differentiated treatment and targeted guidance, and offer more reform approaches or vertical management models for practical implementation. Provincial stations should consult with municipal and county-level stations, adopting a approach of discussing matters on a county-by-county basis to determine the direction for the development of county-level stations, thereby creating a coordinated working framework across all levels. 　　Third, improve the level of monitoring technology. Provincial finances should, based on the local economic development situation, allocate certain funds to county-level monitoring agencies to ensure the normal operation of their work. Introduce senior talent in environmental monitoring, adjust the professional structure of technical personnel, and at the same time provide enhanced professional training for existing monitoring technicians. Ensure proper placement of staff, plan in advance, handle issues related to their retention or departure carefully, and resolve conflicts in employment relationships. Provincial environmental protection administrative departments should, based on the regional environmental characteristics and areas with high pollution levels, allocate special funds for monitoring activities and provide the necessary instruments and equipment. Promoting the transformation of the development direction of county-level monitoring agencies helps them clarify their responsibilities, improve the quality of monitoring work, and enhance the accuracy of environmental monitoring data. 　　Fourth, clarify relationships and accept supervision. After vertical management, county-level monitoring agencies should clarify their roles and positions, manage their relationships with local authorities and relevant departments properly, and carry out environmental monitoring work independently. It is necessary to strengthen the public oversight mechanism and accept supervision over monitoring work from all sectors of society and the general public. This facilitates county-level monitoring agencies to carry out environmental monitoring work independently, ensuring that the monitoring data is accurate and reliable.