Please clarify the rules: “Do not post repeatedly.””
Thread Content
Here, let’s discuss whether this kind of issue will also arise in interdisciplinary contexts once the “prefix addition” feature is officially implemented in the future Of course, by “please do not post repeatedly,” I mean that it must be the same person posting. 1. Similar or identical content within the same section may be caused by network latency, malicious hacking attempts, or a lack of understanding of the content related to that section; in such cases, one can edit the content themselves ； 2. For similar/same content across different sections, it is considered that this issue falls outside the scope of a single specialty; therefore, it needs to be posted in multiple sections in order to resolve one’s problem as soon as possible ； 3. Similar or identical content on different topics and the floors where such replies appear – In cases of similar posts, replies are often posted; occasionally, the original poster realizes that no one is responding and then posts the same content separately ； 4. For other situations, please explain in the follow-up post; I can’t think of any for now. @365and247 – there’s no other meaning to it; let’s discuss it together and work actively to promote the development of the forum. Let the experts take a look at what standards this level gauge connector follows - Powered by Discuz! http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1575947-1-1.html http://down1.hcbbs.com/album/201603/30/140027jyz0e0p460aap6sy.jpg
After the latest update to the UC Browser on mobile phones, replies no longer redirect automatically; as a result, one has to click “Post Reply” several times in a row at first. Once this was understood, it’s still easy to get distracted and not be sure whether “Post Reply” was clicked correctly. To avoid having to edit again, people click once more. In such cases, I edit the second reply, delete the duplicate content, and use it to provide additional responses to other related questions.
This situation falls under the first type, caused by network latency, and the person who posted usually isn’t aware of it.
I won’t talk about posting repeatedly due to network latency. For posts made by a single ID in one forum, that’s fine. PS: If you think a topic can apply to multiple forums, you can post it in those forums for discussion (that’s my personal opinion)
I feel like your options seem a bit conflicting with what you said. . . If it fits multiple categories, should the content be differentiated?
Please do not post repeatedly. This applies to two situations: do not post the same topic repeatedly, and do not post the same replies repeatedly. Reposting of topics usually occurs in cases where people are seeking help; they are eager to resolve their problems as quickly as possible. It also happens when someone posts a topic in two different forums, or even in multiple forums. Reposting due to internet issues is relatively rare. Repeated posting reply: It is usually due to network issues, resulting in passive repeated replies. Reposting topics across different forums is not easy to detect, especially by the forum moderator team that does not regularly check new posts, and it can easily be overlooked. Reposting is generally not done maliciously across multiple threads, and moderators will not delete posts one by one from each thread. As for how to manage it, 1. Reposting topics (across different sections) – decide whether to delete the post based on its content ； (This part relates to flexible management; there’s no need to overcomplicate it–just look at the content of the post and consider the author’s usual style on Haichuan.) 2. For repeated posting of the same topic (in this forum), simply delete one of them ； 3. If a reply is posted repeatedly, simply delete the duplicate replies.
Conflict? I went to school little; don’t lie to me
I saw this and wonder if it’s suitable. . . “I’m a leader; it’s impossible for me to know everything. . . ”
For the first item, I deleted one character; I haven’t encountered that issue with the others
You didn’t say that when you were deleting my floor. . .