HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Advantages and disadvantages of plate heat exchangers

2016-11-14View Original

Thread Content

1. High heat transfer coefficient: The inverted arrangement of different corrugated plates creates complex flow channels, causing the fluid to flow in a three-dimensional rotational pattern within these channels. This leads to turbulence at relatively low Reynolds numbers (typically Re=50~200), resulting in a high heat transfer coefficient; it is generally considered to be 3~5 times that of shell-and-tube exchangers.   2. The logarithmic mean temperature difference is large while the terminal temperature difference is small. In shell-and-tube heat exchangers, the two fluids flow separately in the tube side and the shell side, resulting in a cross-flow pattern; hence the logarithmic mean temperature difference correction factor is low. In plate heat exchangers, the flow is usually parallel or counterflow, and the correction factor is also around 0.95. Additionally, in plate heat exchangers, the cold and hot fluids flow parallel to the heat exchange surface without any bypass flow, which results in a small terminal temperature difference – it can be less than 1°C for heat exchange with water, whereas in shell-and-tube heat exchangers it is generally around 5°C.   3. Small footprint: The plate heat exchanger has a compact structure, with a heat exchange area per unit volume that is 2 to 5 times that of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger. It also does not require space for removing the tube bundles for maintenance, as is the case with shell-and-tube heat exchangers. Therefore, to achieve the same heat exchange capacity, the footprint of a plate heat exchanger is only about 1/5 to 1/8 of that of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger. 4. Easy to adjust the heat exchange area or process configuration: By adding or removing a few plates, it is possible to increase or decrease the heat exchange area ; By changing the arrangement of the plates or replacing a few of them, it is possible to achieve the desired combination of processes and adapt to new heat exchange conditions, whereas it is almost impossible to increase the heat transfer area of shell-and-tube heat exchangers.   5. Light weight: The thickness of the plates in plate heat exchangers is only 0.4–0.8 mm, while the thickness of the heat exchange tubes in shell-and-tube heat exchangers is 2.0–2.5 mm. The shell of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger is much heavier than the frame of a plate heat exchanger; generally, a plate heat exchanger weighs only about 1/5 as much as a shell-and-tube heat exchanger.   6. Low cost: Using the same materials and with the same heat exchange area, the price of plate heat exchangers is about 40%~60% lower than that of shell-and-tube heat exchangers. 7. Easy to manufacture: The heat transfer plates of plate heat exchangers are produced through stamping, which ensures a high degree of standardization and enables mass production; shell-and-tube heat exchangers are generally manufactured manually.   8. Easy to clean: For frame-type plate heat exchangers, it is sufficient to loosen the tightening bolts in order to separate the plate bundles and remove the plates for mechanical cleaning, which is very convenient for heat exchange systems that require frequent cleaning.   9. Low heat loss: In plate heat exchangers, only the outer shell plates of the heat transfer plates are exposed to the atmosphere; therefore, heat loss is negligible, and no insulation measures are required. Shell-and-tube heat exchangers have high heat losses and require insulation.   10. The capacity is 10%~20% lower than that of shell-and-tube heat exchangers. 11. The pressure loss per unit length is high; due to the small gaps between the heat transfer surfaces as well as the irregularities on these surfaces, the pressure loss is greater compared to that of traditional smooth tubes.   12. Low tendency to scale: Due to sufficient turbulence inside, it is not prone to scaling; its scaling coefficient is only 1/3 to 1/10 that of shell-and-tube heat exchangers. 13. The operating pressure should not be too high, nor should the temperature of the fluid be too high, as this may lead to leakage. Plate heat exchangers use gaskets for sealing, and the operating pressure generally should not exceed 2.5 MPa; the fluid temperature should be below 250°C, otherwise leakage may occur.   14. Prone to clogging: Due to the narrow channels between the plates, which are typically only 2–5 mm wide, these channels can easily become blocked when the heat exchange medium contains large particles or fibrous substances. The above content has been compiled based on the problems encountered by trainees in their actual work, for reference only. If you have any issues, please feel free to communicate and provide feedback promptly.
Reply #22016-11-14
The heat transfer coefficient is high, generally considered to be 3 to 5 times that of shell-and-tube types
Reply #32016-11-15
The main issue is poor pressure resistance; it gets clogged easily, especially when the water quality is poor. Low temperatures can cause freezing issues, and it also doesn’t perform well with air conditioners
Reply #42016-11-17
Plate heat exchangers offer excellent heat transfer efficiency, require little space, and are easy to maintain
Reply #52016-11-21
Previously, our company had many plate heat exchangers; these exchangers offer excellent heat exchange performance, but they are more expensive than shell-and-tube heat exchangers. However, there are also many issues; the heat exchange medium must be clean and resistant to scaling. Disassembling, cleaning it is rather troublesome; it has to be taken apart piece by piece, and the gasket needs to be replaced after just a few disassemblies. Installation is rather troublesome; the gasket needs glue, otherwise it won’t be able to stay attached to the plate. Moreover, if there are sand holes in the plates, it’s very difficult to locate them; usually, it requires the help of the manufacturer’s staff, as it’s hard to find them on one’s own.
Reply #62016-11-23
It indeed occupies less space and is easy to maintain, but poor water quality can be a problem. If maintenance has to be carried out in the dead of winter, removing the plates can be quite troublesome. Overall, however, plate heat exchangers are still better than shell-and-tube heat exchangers.
Reply #72016-11-24
Advantages: High heat transfer coefficient; Small footprint ; Light weight ; Low price ; Easy to make ; Easy to clean ; Low heat loss. Disadvantage: under pressure ; Prone to clogging ; The capacity is small.
Reply #82016-11-24
Plate heat exchangers have a simple principle, but cleaning them seems to be rather inconvenient
Reply #92016-11-29
The advantages are high heat transfer efficiency and small floor space, while the disadvantages are poor resistance to high temperatures and pressures, as well as a short lifespan for the sealing gaskets
Reply #102017-11-02
It has high requirements regarding temperature, pressure, and water quality; other aspects are fine, but these three factors limit its use in many situations.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.