Must the alarm setpoint for the same function code be lower than the interlock setpoint? 【Video】 @ ChemicalTalkEveryDay AT23
Thread Content
https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1vsrHYhE5W/?vd_source=da9d94541b91b6cd653b8f4711ef6a6f Contributions are welcome to 【Chemical Industry Weekly Talk】. Contact us via private message or @. WeChat account: 【Jietou Toutiao】 – Hua Hai Chuan Liu hcbbs; 【Douyin】 account: Hua Hai Chuan Liu hcbbs; 【Bilibili】 account: Hua Hai Chuan Liu hcbbs; 【Baidu Baijia】 account: Hai Chuan Chemical Forum; WeChat subscription account: hcbbs2004. Hai Chuan website: hcbbs.com. Chemical industry directory: bbs.hcbbs.com/hcbbs.html. Hai Chuan Chemical Forum: bbs.hcbbs.com. Company brand promotion, cooperation, and joint development – 18840911640
The alarm setpoint for the same parameter usually needs to be lower than the interlock setpoint, in order to provide early warning before a situation that could lead to safety issues arises, thus allowing appropriate actions to be taken to prevent accidents. This design makes the system more secure and helps prevent unexpected situations. .
If interlocking has already been activated, what is the purpose of issuing another alarm? Is it to notify the person to restore the interlock to its previous state?