HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Should containers holding explosive materials undergo 100% non-destructive testing?

2017-07-21View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by SDHZZXM on 2017-7-21 at 11:10. As the title suggests: Should containers holding explosive materials undergo 100% non-destructive testing? During the recent review for the renewal of the certification for pressure vessel design in our company, the review experts believed that vessels holding explosive materials required 100% non-destructive testing. What is the basis for this? Are there any regulations in standards and norms regarding this?
Reply #22017-07-21
It’s available on 150; the clause is that explosive materials don’t necessarily have to be 100% prohibited, right?
Reply #32017-07-21
The large capacity regulations also do not specify explosive media separately
Reply #42017-07-21
This post was last edited by SDHZZXM on 2017-7-21 at 11:39. Did the old specifications and standards require this? GB 12337-2014 \"Steel Spherical Storage Tanks\" specifies this requirement:
Reply #52017-07-21
It still depends on the specific operating conditions, the design pressure, and whether it belongs to category three
Reply #62017-07-21
Oh, is that a spherical tank? Then it still has to be done strictly
Reply #72017-07-21
There are no specific regulations; rather, it is decided during the design phase whether to conduct full testing or only partial testing, based on the design parameters of the equipment handling explosive materials, the importance of the equipment, and the difficulty of manufacturing it.
Reply #82017-07-22
It is not necessary; the tolerance specifications and 150 do not require 100% radiographic inspection separately. Our local special inspection agency also does not require 100% compliance. It mainly depends on the operating conditions; I mainly work with type 2 containers, and type 3 ones are used very rarely by me.
Reply #92017-07-22
There is a difference between flammable and explosive, as well as highly hazardous and extremely hazardous.
Reply #102017-07-24
If 100% non-destructive testing is required only for media that are explosive, no other codes stipulate that such testing must be carried out except for spherical tanks. Based on my experience, testing that is not required by the codes need not be performed. For devices with high parameters, the requirements can be appropriately increased.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.