Thread Content
There are water-cooled condensers, air-cooled condensers, and evaporative condensers available on the market. Next, we will talk about evaporative condensers. An evaporative condenser, abbreviated as evapcooling, operates on the principle that water sprayed outside the coil evaporates and absorbs heat, thereby lowering the temperature of this water. The cooled water then absorbs heat from the hot fluid inside the coil, allowing the fluid inside the coil to gradually change from a gaseous state to a liquid state – it is thus a heat transfer and mass transfer device. A conventional condenser is a pure heat exchange process without mass transfer; its basic principle relies on the cold fluid to cool the gaseous medium into a liquid state. The latent heat released during this condensation process raises the temperature, and heat transfer is achieved through heat exchange with the cold fluid surrounding the tubes. The medium on the cold side of a water-cooled condenser is water, while the medium on the cold side of an air-cooled condenser is air. Water-cooled condensers require additional cooling water, which usually comes from a cooling tower. An air-cooled condenser relies on flowing air for cooling, so it requires a fan. Feature No. 1 of evaporative condensers: Compared to air-cooled condensers, they offer higher heat exchange efficiency and lower energy consumption. The evaporation of water requires a large amount of heat, and this heat comes from the medium that is being condensed. The evaporation of water is determined by the enthalpy difference between the cooling water and the air; it can occur as long as the temperature of the medium is higher than the wet-bulb temperature of the air. Therefore, the only power required is to allow steam to flow out of the system, so energy consumption is very low, and the air volume requirement is also low. Second: Compared to water-cooled condensers, evaporation cooling systems are simpler; cooling and condensation are integrated, and even the temperature difference at the interface is eliminated. Water exchanges heat with the medium to be condensed while it evaporates, something that systems consisting of a cooling tower and a condenser cannot achieve. Although traditional evaporative condensers have the advantages mentioned above, they still have significant drawbacks. When outdoor temperatures are very low in winter, it is practically impossible to use air for direct cooling in order to avoid water evaporation, as evaporative coil coolers cannot achieve direct dry air cooling. Conventional dry air coolers rely on finned tubes, but these cannot be used for evaporative cooling even in summer. Finned tubes are unable to prevent corrosion caused by sprayed water, and they also suffer from scale formation issues. In response to the above issues, Shenzhen Aikemike Technology Co., Ltd. has developed a detachable plate-type evaporative cooler that addresses the problems associated with air cooling, water cooling, coiled tubes, and finned tubes. It enables a combination of water cooling and air cooling, with the ability to switch between dry and wet cooling modes according to the season. Evaporative cooling is used in summer, while air dry cooling is employed in spring, autumn, and winter, which not only saves a large amount of energy but also reduces almost all water waste.
Although plate-type evaporative cooling has existed for a long time, it is primarily used in the petrochemical industry and not in the circulating water and refrigeration sectors. Based on the plate-type structures used in the circulating water industry and the feedback received, the heat exchange efficiency is extremely poor; even when the system is changed from a single-flow configuration to a two-flow configuration, the efficiency remains inferior to that of the coiled-tube design. Only by adopting a plate-and-tube multi-flow configuration can the heat exchange efficiency be significantly improved. Given that your panel structure still relies on the traditional plate design, the heat exchange efficiency is likely to be poor. Moreover, this detachable structure is of little use to most manufacturers, so I am not optimistic about this approach. It’s just my personal opinion; please don’t criticize if you don’t agree
What you mentioned does indeed exist; traditional plate heat exchangers are not very good. But we took these factors into account long ago. The new plate design we have developed addresses exactly these shortcomings, which is why there is such a new technology. If it were to achieve the same results as traditional ones, then there would be no need to develop this product at all. You still lack an understanding of Ecomic. :handshake
Plate heat exchangers are good; they have a higher heat exchange efficiency than finned tubes and require less floor space. But in an atmospheric spray environment, the conditions are quite harsh for plate exchangers! Taking both lifespan and maintenance into account, the fin structure is likely to be more durable.
What my friend said makes sense – traditional manufacturing processes do have such problems. Plate exchangers have existed for a long time, but they also rely on welding techniques; their maintenance requirements are similar to those of coiled tube exchangers. It is precisely because these issues cannot be resolved with traditional heat exchange components that it took Aikemik more than two years to develop this entirely innovative plate exchanger. This detachable type of plate exchanger offers superior heat exchange efficiency, longer lifespan, and easier maintenance, thereby revolutionizing the structure of traditional cooling towers and achieving a true breakthrough in innovation.
Our plate-type closed towers have been used in the circulating water systems of the metallurgical industry for about 15 years now. LONGHUA