HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Questions about TURCK proximity switches

2018-02-08View Original

Thread Content

TURCK position switch, model 1 – how many two-core wires are needed for wiring it? 2. Is it set to the current-mode type in the diagram? If so, how should a safety barrier be connected to it? How many pieces are needed for one valve?
Reply #22018-02-08
As can be seen from the diagram, there are two proximity switches involved, so two two-core instrument wires are required. The supply voltage is 8.2VDC; it is of the intrinsically safe type. Two signals – open and closed – require two safety barriers
Reply #32018-02-09
Looking at the wiring diagram, the meter head has 8 terminals. 1234 is easy to understand, but the diagram for 5678 is confusing
Reply #42018-02-09
Two two-core wires are required; it’s an intrinsically safe NAMUR-type proximity switch, and a safety barrier is definitely necessary. I’m not very familiar with the specifics of safety barriers.
Reply #52018-02-09
“\"TURCK\" – is it a Nazi dog? What kind of crappy diagram is this? . . For intrinsically safe meters, aren’t there any intrinsically safe wiring connections? For any intrinsically safe gauge that is not of the two-wire type, a safety barrier must be installed at its output terminal! The power supply side must use an intrinsically safe power source; generally, it does not support power supply from safety barriers. . . Nazi dogs, those dogs really do look evil, with split tails too – is the power supply 8.2V? Those damned dogs really know how to bite and dig at eggs.
Reply #62018-02-09
Intrinsic safety type proximity switches are not reliable; our company mainly uses flameproof contact-type switches
Reply #72018-02-10
5678 is just an intermediate terminal block
Reply #82018-03-05
Are they all SIL2-rated devices? Is redundancy required? If that’s the case, then it’s correct – as long as there is a signal in any one of the circuits. It seems to be independent dual-channel devices
Reply #92018-03-05
It should be an intrinsically safe, redundant dual-channel device; one isolation barrier is used for dual channels, and two for single channels.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.