How to automatically update the initial value of the mass flow rate for stream flows with one click?
Thread Content
This post was last edited by longkui1990 on 2015-11-21 at 13:32. For so long, I have had to manually adjust the mass flow rate; by simply using Input——Update——All, the mass flow rate I entered is changed to a molar flow rate. I’m not sure if there’s a way to automatically update the mass flow rate. O(∩_∩)O Thank you
There’s an update to the initial estimates
That value becomes a molar flow rate as soon as anything happens; the number is too small. I need the mass flow rate. .
It seems there’s no solution for now; the suggestion is good. I’ll bring it up with them
If possible, provide the three bases: default, mass, and mole. With default, the value updated is the mass entered; with mole, it is the moles entered. For mass, regardless of whether mass or moles were entered initially, the value updated is mass. With mole, again, regardless of whether mass or moles were entered initially, the value updated is moles. .
Ugh, I guess when choosing one-click updating, not that much thought is given to it. Normally, it should be about \"maintaining the user’s original intention\" – whatever type of setting was used originally, that’s the type that should be retained after the update. If someone wants something different, then they’ll have to go through the hassle of setting it up again
When the software performs calculations, is the mass flow rate first converted into a molar flow rate before other variables are calculated? So it makes sense to set the molar flow rate from the beginning; this should have been taken into account during software design. This value is simply for reference only; it has no impact on the results.
It would be fine to have a default option too; right now everything is in moles. Although I think I’m being a bit pedantic about it. .
I think so too. . . . . ;P
Great! The system’s default calculation should be based on moles. It would be more user-friendly if the quality settings could be maintained after the update~
Well, using mass just adds an extra step of conversion. Just enhancing this feature will do. Just add a button for mole and mass. Development should still be simple. No one has raised this issue over all these years; it seems that it is still based on moles. Everyone looks at the final result, not this assignment.