Should the rules for selecting the top 10 in Haichuan be made clearer?
Thread Content
Should the rules for the HaiChuan Top 10 selection be made clearer? I saw that in the top 10 selection event, many moderators and super moderators had their charm points deducted due to multiple entries, and some administrative staff who tried to participate were told their entries were invalid. It’s clear that people aren’t familiar with the rules of this event; I hope they will be written out more clearly. I feel sorry for those whose charm points were deducted.
Has the post been improved? The last time I checked, it was said to be pending.
I don’t know. Look, so many people have their charm points deducted, and some are even prevented from participating; this shows that everyone doesn’t fully understand the rules, or perhaps the rules themselves aren’t clearly defined, leading to different interpretations among people
It’s written quite clearly; sometimes it’s because people don’t read it carefully
This post was last edited by jlszhoujidai on 2015-12-6 at 13:52; it’s now quite clear...
The regulations are quite clear. I hope the site administrator can implement technical measures to restrict each person to posting only one reply, thereby avoiding points being deducted for multiple replies, and it will also facilitate future statistics and organization.
A invalid vote was cast – only the front part was seen, not the back part. 1. Each member can recommend someone or apply for recommendation once only; multiple responses are invalid and result in a penalty (–3 charm points per additional recommendation). Recommend people you think can be helpful to you, or those you believe can contribute to the development of the forum. 2. Recommended candidates: Selection principle – Members who, during their participation in HaiChuan in 2015, made outstanding contributions and demonstrated excellent performance in areas such as technical exchanges, mutual assistance, forum development and management, and maintenance. 1. Each participating member can recommend a maximum of 1 person; any additional recommendations will render the prize invalid in case of a win. Do you think it would be better to combine these two rules? ? ? ? ? ?
Is it unclear what the rules are, or are the rules themselves unclear, or is everyone deliberately breaking them? ? ?
This post was last edited by leo_0088 on 2015-12-23 08:42. The rules are clearly stated; the main difference is that last year multiple people were allowed, while this year only one person is permitted;P