Flue gas desulfurization

This post was last edited by luoli519 on 2016-4-29 at 13:51. For dry dust removal of flue gases, electrostatic dust removal alone cannot be considered the only option. Electrostatic dust removal has frequently shown its inadequacy for actual operating conditions in the application of flue gas desulfurization, denitration, and dust removal in power plants. Those familiar with electrostatic dust removal equipment know that this technology imposes strict requirements on the types of particles carried by the airflow, as well as on the size distribution of those particles in the airflow ； Otherwise, the operational efficiency is not satisfactory, and the operating costs are high. Regarding the use of electrostatic dust removal technology, if it can be combined with dynamic and efficient gas-solid separation techniques such as multi-factor cyclone mother-son separation, the multi-factor cyclone mother-son separator, which has low operating costs, can remove the vast majority of particles carried in the airflow in advance ； Let the electrostatic dust removal equipment capture the remaining, very small particles. This dry dust removal technology, which combines a \"multi-factor swirl separator for separating mother and daughter streams\" with electrostatic dust removal, ensures smoother system operation, lower operational and maintenance costs, and better exhaust gas parameters. For more information on multi-factor cyclone mother-son separators and other high-efficiency dynamic separation technologies and equipment, please visit the HaiChuan Chemical Industry Forum at the direct link http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1354813-1-1.html. For more professional technical separation solutions, please contact a specialized separation technology company.