The hazards of signal transmission towers operated by China Mobile, China Unicom, and China Telecom – please provide an answer
Thread Content
This post was last edited by fight3558586 on 2016-11-7 at 11:22. Recently, a new signal tower is being built near my home (in the countryside). There are definitely risks, and I’m aware of that; it’s just that no conclusive evidence of this kind can be found online. When I was in school, I remember that such hazards were also discussed in class. Are there any specific and clear explanations on this topic? For example, determining how many meters the hazardous area extends. During my university days, an experienced teacher said that the staff dormitories in our old campus were located near research institutes dealing with wireless technologies, which meant that the transmission power there was relatively high; moreover, there were several transmission towers in that area. When the teacher was speaking, he explained that many of the older employees are now sick, with various illnesses. Radiation is something that affects people over the course of many years. The reply and resume functions have been disabled; ratings will be given only if there are clear regulations regarding replies. Thank you
Is that true? Is it certain that the illness is related to the signal tower?
Is that true? Is it certain that the illness is related to the signal tower?
It shouldn’t make much of a difference; we have signal amplifiers installed in our office as well.
Such signal radiation is certainly harmful to the human body; it depends mainly on the transmission power. If the power is low, as in the case of mobile phones or home wireless routers, then there’s actually no serious issue. But signal transmission towers have an impact on humans, as their power level is too high. I learned it in school back then, but since the industry I work in doesn’t involve it, I gave it back to the teacher.
Yes, it exists, but there is no classification for it; the main cycle is simply too long. I saw a survey conducted by a non-professional organization on such incidence rates, and it indeed has an impact. It’s just that nothing **confirming this was found; in other words, it neither states that there is an impact nor that there isn’t.
With communication being so advanced these days, radiation is everywhere.....
There’s a rather far-fetched answer: among occupational diseases, the factor of \"radiation\" also exists. Now it can be extremely advanced, with things that are invisible and intangible.
The problem shouldn’t be too serious, as safety assessments are generally carried out during design and installation
Indeed, since this is a new construction, an assessment must definitely be carried out.