Thread Content
I’ll share a case (I’ve hidden the specific name of the company). In one company’s workshop, maintenance work was being carried out. The tank in question had two layers, with an access hatch on each layer; the maintenance work took place on the lower layer. In the permit for working in a confined space, the workshop supervisor was designated as the supervisor. During the work, the maintenance personnel wore protective gear while carrying out their tasks. The workshop supervisor called a worker to take over as the supervisor and then left. After the lower level had been inspected, the maintenance workers found the workshop supervisor lying at the upper access hatch, dead from poisoning. This is a typical example of a middle-level manager with weak awareness of self-protection, a real-life example. High demands are placed on employees, but what about oneself?
Entered a confined space without wearing any protective equipment.
All are equal before the law, and all are equal in terms of safety.
If leaders themselves do not abide by safety regulations, it is evident that there are serious issues with the company’s safety management.
There are serious problems with the company’s safety management; the management does not lead by example in adhering to safety rules, so it is even less likely that the workers will pay attention to them
The uniqueness of leadership determines the regulatory capacity of a company’s security department