HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Questions regarding pipeline flaw detection

2019-05-07View Original

Thread Content

In my case, the construction party doesn’t want to carry out RT testing and wants to switch to UT testing. What’s going on? Is RT testing more complex than UT testing?
Reply #22019-05-07
One is a ray, the other is ultrasound; the detection devices are different, and so are the detection costs
Reply #32019-05-07
Generally, RT is used; isn’t the inspection effectiveness of RT for pipes not as good as that of UT?
Reply #42019-05-07
RT is better for wall thicknesses less than 10 mm, while UT is better for wall thicknesses greater than 10 mm; both are used for detecting weld defects.
Reply #52019-05-09
Pipe wall thicknesses of 6 MM or less cannot be inspected using UT

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.