HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Why can’t the manhole section sw6 on the head be calculated?

2018-07-17View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by zhangjuhua on 2018-7-17 08:36. I have a question: On the elliptical head EHA1000X8, there is a manhole section with dimensions Φ410x5 that extends perpendicular to the surface of the head; it is located at a distance of 315 from the center. In this case, SW6 cannot be calculated, and an error in the input data is indicated. However, when the distance is 314, SW6 can be calculated. Why is that?
Reply #22018-07-17
This post was last edited by han*nruoshui on 2018-7-17 09:56. I gave it a try – 300 is required; that is, the inner wall of the 300-mm diameter access hole needs to be at the same level as the inner wall of the cover. According to what you said, the access holes extend beyond the range of the cover. I calculated it using various components; I’m not sure which method you used, original poster
Reply #32018-07-17
I calculated it using a vertical container; it’s not the genuine version. Is the inner wall of the manhole fitting exactly level with the inner wall of the head? For the plug-in type, it’s perpendicular to the surface of the head – but it goes beyond the boundaries of the head What range? The reinforcement range, or beyond the surface of the head? It has been measured, and it hasn’t reached the end of the head yet
Reply #42018-07-17
410/2+315=520, which is already above the limit
Reply #52018-07-17
But it’s a 1:1 ratio; since it’s curved, it doesn’t go beyond the limits of the cover, with still a vertical distance of sixty or seventy units from the end
Reply #62018-07-17
The original poster is talking about normal take over, not axial Take over!
Reply #72018-07-18
When using the legitimate V3.1 online version of the component module for calculations, 314 is indeed required to carry out the calculations; it might be a software issue. 314 thiophene was chosen from the start in the design.
Reply #82018-07-18
Mine isn’t the genuine version: lol It seems to be a deliberate restriction
Reply #92018-08-24
:Lol, I’ll keep it here for everyone to see – it’s good to learn from it; why delete it?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.