HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Is a box-type furnace or a cylindrical furnace better for heating the feed in a 1-million-ton hydrogenation reforming reactor?

2016-08-08View Original

Thread Content

For a 1-million-ton hydrogenation refining reaction feed heater, is a box-type furnace better or a cylindrical furnace?
Reply #22016-08-08
Either works. Let the design institute do the calculations; use the furnace type that is needed.
Reply #32016-08-08
From what I’ve seen in the literature, double-chamber box furnaces are generally used.
Reply #42016-08-08
Either is fine; hydrogenation refinement is a highly exothermic reaction, and it is basically used at the start of operation.
Reply #52016-08-09
A square furnace is recommended, as it is easier to control than a cylindrical furnace. Although it is used more often for starting up operations, it still needs to be functional.
Reply #62016-08-09
According to the design from the design institute, the hydrocracking reaction heating furnace uses a square furnace with multiple heating points

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.