HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Fire-resistant cables cannot replace flame-retardant cables

2019-03-31View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by louhoo on 2019-3-31 11:09. When reviewing the drawings for the automatic fire alarm system, some design firms chose fire-resistant cables for all of them. I pointed out that according to Article 11.2.2 (mandatory provision) of the \"Code for Design of Automatic Fire Alarm Systems\" (GB 50116-2013), the alarm bus must be flame-retardant or flame-retardant and fire-resistant; fire-resistant cables cannot be used. The response from design firms is usually that fire-resistant cables can replace flame-retardant cables; I also found many posts online stating that they can be used as substitutes. In my opinion, it is irreplaceable for the following two reasons: 1. According to the \"General Rules for Flame-Retardant and Fire-Resistant Wires and Cables\" (GBT 19666-2005), fire-resistant cables are classified into several types. As can be seen from this classification, the first type does not possess flame-retardant properties; it merely has a fire-resistant layer added to an ordinary cable. This is probably why the specifications state “flame-retardant or flame-retardant and fire-resistant cables”, rather than “flame-retardant or fire-resistant cables”. 2. The combustion characteristic tests for flame-retardant cables and fire-resistant cables are completely different, and the test criteria that need to be met also vary. The flame retardancy test is specified in: \"Test methods for cables and optical fibers under flame conditions – Part 11: Test for vertical flame spread of individual insulated wires and cables – Test apparatus\" (GB/T 18380.11-2008) ; The fire resistance test is specified in: \"Test for the integrity of cables or optical fibers under flame conditions – Part 23: Test procedures and requirements – Data cables\" (GB/T 19216.23-2003). In summary, I believe that since these are mandatory provisions in the standards, they must be treated strictly; they cannot be viewed in a casual manner, and design should be carried out carefully in accordance with the standards. If you have different opinions, feel free to discuss them.
Reply #22022-06-01
It still has to be done in accordance with the specifications and standards
Reply #32022-06-03
Refractory cables are safer than flame-retardant cables and can replace them; flame-retardant cables, on the other hand, cannot replace refractory cables

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.