Does the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement mean that 1234yf cannot be put into practical use within 10 years?

2018-01-27View Original

Thread Content

1234yf was developed specifically for global warming. The United States claims that global warming is a conspiracy; does this mean that there is no need at all to develop 1234yf technology, and that 134a does not need to be replaced?

Reply #22018-01-28

The United States is a country that is centered around itself; it opposes and creates trouble whenever anything does not serve its interests, as history has proven time and again!

Reply #32018-01-29

If the United States does not give its approval, then will the development and application of 1234yf have no future?

Reply #42018-01-30

The United States is the leader in the world; it sets the rules

Reply #52018-01-30

Then won’t those who work on 1234yf in China cry?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.

Does the United States’ withdrawal from the Paris Agreement mean that 1234yf cannot be put into practical use within 10 years?

Thread Content

Related Threads in This Forum

← Previous

Next →

Submit a Project

Disclaimer

Quick Links